port-or-generator argument in reference implementation
Shiro Kawai
(04 Aug 2020 21:39 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation Amirouche Boubekki (05 Aug 2020 06:34 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Aug 2020 06:37 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation
Shiro Kawai
(05 Aug 2020 07:38 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation
Amirouche Boubekki
(07 Aug 2020 03:07 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation
Amirouche Boubekki
(07 Aug 2020 16:27 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(07 Aug 2020 18:19 UTC)
|
Re: port-or-generator argument in reference implementation Amirouche Boubekki 05 Aug 2020 06:34 UTC
Hello Shiro :) Le mar. 4 août 2020 à 23:39, Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> a écrit : > > json-fold is supposed to take a port or a char generator, but in the reference > implementation it passes the argument directly to json-generator, which only > accepts a port. json-generator passes its arguments to json-tokens which accepts a port or generator. Indeed there is a mistake in the specification json-generator should mention port-or-generator as argument. > By the way, the srfi text of json-fold says : "The behavior of json-fold is only > specified when PORT-OR-GENERATOR follows the json-generator protocol." > What does "json-generator protocol" mean? The json-generator protocol at https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-180/srfi-180.html#json-generator-port