New draft (#8) of SRFI 181: Port Positioning Arthur A. Gleckler (24 Aug 2020 04:24 UTC)
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 181: Port Positioning Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (24 Aug 2020 10:23 UTC)
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 181: Port Positioning John Cowan (24 Aug 2020 14:59 UTC)
Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 181: Port Positioning Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (24 Aug 2020 15:02 UTC)

Re: New draft (#8) of SRFI 181: Port Positioning Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 24 Aug 2020 15:02 UTC

Am Mo., 24. Aug. 2020 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:

> The actual wording is "Returns #t if obj is an object created by `error` or one
> of an implementation-defined set of objects."  That would, of course, include objects raised by make-codec, if `error` is not used to raise them.

> I see no particular reason to have a specific predicate.

It would make "guard" more specific and the actual exception object
could, at least in principle, contain more information than just a
"message" and the "irritants" of the "error" procedure.