Re: SRFI 182: ADBMAL, ALET, and ALET* Joo ChurlSoo (11 Mar 2020 04:52 UTC)
Re: SRFI 182: ADBMAL, ALET, and ALET* Marc Feeley (11 Mar 2020 14:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 182: ADBMAL, ALET, and ALET* Joo ChurlSoo (11 Mar 2020 23:50 UTC)

Re: SRFI 182: ADBMAL, ALET, and ALET* Joo ChurlSoo 11 Mar 2020 04:52 UTC

 | For example:
 | (define x 1)
 | (define y 2)
 | (define a (adbmal x y))
 | (define a* (adbmal* x y))
 | (define v (values x y))		error:racket
 | (define v* (lambda () (values x y)))
 | (define listxy (lambda (x y) (list x y)))

 | (a listxy)        	       	= (1 2)
 | (a* listxy)      	      	= (1 2)
 | (call-with-values v listxy)  	error
 | (call-with-values v* listxy)    = (1 2)
 | (receive (x y) v (list x y))	error or (1 2):gambit
 | (receive (x y) v* (list x y))	error
 | (receive (x y) (v*) (list x y)) = (1 2)

 | (set! x 10)
 | (set! y 20)
 | (a listxy)	       	       	= (10 20)
 | (a* listxy)      	      	= (1 2)
 | (call-with-values v* listxy)    = (10 20)
 | (receive (x y) (v*) (list x y)) = (10 20)
 | (receive (x y) v (list x y))	error or (1 2):gambit

By the way, which do you think is correct, racket or gambit?

--
Joo ChurlSoo