(1) The first paragraph after Specification/Procedures is jumbled.
I'm not sure it even needs "This SRFI also provides two new convenience macros." here.
The rest is ungrammatical.
Yikes. That's what comes from my reading the diffs instead of the document itself. Sorry for not catching that.
John, I'm not quite sure what you intended there. Shall I restore "We add two new functions. The most frequently used is likely to be" in place of "This SRFI also provides two new convenience macros."? That appears to be where the edit went wrong.
(2) It might be worth explicitly mentioning that string-append! and string-replace!
are macro versions of the SRFI-118 procedures, and thus "mostly-compatible" with the latter.
Not sure where/how best to do that,
I will wait for John to suggest language for that.