|
Why splicing syntax? Duy Nguyen (27 Mar 2020 08:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
(no sender)
(27 Mar 2020 08:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(28 Mar 2020 05:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Mar 2020 08:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
(no sender)
(30 Mar 2020 08:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
John Cowan
(30 Mar 2020 14:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
(no sender)
(30 Mar 2020 14:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
John Cowan
(30 Mar 2020 15:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Why splicing syntax?
Duy Nguyen
(31 Mar 2020 10:05 UTC)
|
Why splicing syntax? Duy Nguyen 27 Mar 2020 08:17 UTC
This may be a dumb question but what does splicing syntax give? Or maybe I'm confused because these two paragraphs in the rationale should be "splicing" instead of "non-splicing"? "The usefulness of the non-splicing versions seems to be non-controversional. For example, SRFI 148's em syntax would become unnecessary. Thus, this SRFI proposes the non-splicing versions of let-syntax and letrec-syntax for R7RS under a different name." -- Duy