Am Mi., 17. Juni 2020 um 04:39 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <email@example.com>:
> While this is unobjectionable in itself, it's hard to know where to stop. One of the SRFI 145 examples is (assume (exact-integer? x) ...). This could be changed to (assume-exact-integer x ...), but I don't think it would be very useful to add this macro to a SRFI.
That's a good point.
So the only reasonable way to have an implementation of the semantics
of assume-just in a SRFI would be to make the parameter FAILURE of
maybe-ref optional again so that the default is (lambda () (assume #f
What do you think?