LC 2 changes
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(10 Jul 2020 02:39 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(10 Jul 2020 06:03 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes
John Cowan
(10 Jul 2020 20:21 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(10 Jul 2020 20:50 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes
John Cowan
(10 Jul 2020 22:33 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (10 Jul 2020 23:55 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes
John Cowan
(11 Jul 2020 15:13 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Jul 2020 19:08 UTC)
|
Re: LC 2 changes Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 10 Jul 2020 23:55 UTC
On 2020-07-10 18:33 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:50 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen < > xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote: > > It is unfortunate that this isn't being resolved by some rationale > > argument. You gave an argument about iterating over a list of thunks > > but that has been defeated. > > That was an example rather than an argument. But what can I say? You > believe your view is better, I believe mine is, and no one else is saying > anything. Since it's my SRFI, I end up making the final decision. Why not have both, the macro and the procedure? The example of call-with-values suggests that, if people use a thunked procedure frequently, someone will eventually add a dethunked form. Since such a form has been proposed and uses basically the same implementation as the procedure, we could save someone a future SRFI and add it now. -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> "Computer science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes." --pseudo-Dijkstra