Re: Bug in time<=? and time>=?

Re: Bug in time<=? and time>=? Michael Sperber 08 Dec 2009 15:03 UTC

Thanks for the report - I've fixed the reference implementation.

Dave Gurnell <xxxxxx@untyped.com> writes:

> I think there is a bug in the implementation of the aforementioned
> procedures. The same bug is present in time<=? and time>=?. I'll use
> the PLT implementation of time<=? as an example:

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla