Bug in date->string Dave Gurnell (30 Jan 2010 10:51 UTC)
Re: Bug in date->string Michael Sperber (01 Feb 2010 16:37 UTC)

Re: Bug in date->string Michael Sperber 01 Feb 2010 16:37 UTC

Dave Gurnell <xxxxxx@gmail.com> writes:

> I think I found a bug in date->string. The ~Y pattern doesn't
> correctly pad years up to 4 digits:

Many thanks for the report - I've uploaded a fixed reference
implementation.

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla