Group Email Manager

login signup
date->string ~D dd/mm/yy vs mm/dd/yy Kevin Ryde (29 May 2003 14:45 UTC)
Re: date->string ~D dd/mm/yy vs mm/dd/yy Will Fitzgerald (29 May 2003 17:30 UTC)
Re: date->string ~D dd/mm/yy vs mm/dd/yy Will Fitzgerald 29 May 2003 17:30 UTC 
My intent is what is in the reference implementation, but given the
difficulty in modifying the SRFI, should we just change the
implementation?

Will Fitzgerald
xxxxxx@kzoo.edu

On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 08:49  PM, Kevin Ryde wrote:

> The documentation for date->string says ~D gives dd/mm/yy, but the
> reference implementation says mm/dd/yy.  (Assuming I'm looking at the
> right bits of both.)
>
>     http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-19/srfi-19.html
>     http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-19/srfi-19.scm
>
> Which is intended?
>
> --
> Please Cc followups.
>