|
Review of first draft
John Cowan
(20 Apr 2020 14:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of first draft
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2020 15:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of first draft
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(20 Apr 2020 15:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of first draft
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2020 15:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of first draft
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(20 Apr 2020 15:45 UTC)
|
|
Loading code from standard input
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2020 16:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(20 Apr 2020 16:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Lassi Kortela
(20 Apr 2020 16:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
John Cowan
(20 Apr 2020 17:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Lassi Kortela
(26 May 2020 12:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
John Cowan
(26 May 2020 17:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Lassi Kortela
(26 May 2020 17:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
John Cowan
(26 May 2020 17:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Lassi Kortela
(26 May 2020 18:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 May 2020 18:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input Lassi Kortela (26 May 2020 18:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Vladimir Nikishkin
(27 May 2020 07:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Loading code from standard input
Lassi Kortela
(27 May 2020 08:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Review of first draft
John Cowan
(20 Apr 2020 16:02 UTC)
|
> R7RS top-level programs are just > perfect to serve as scripts in the Unix sense. It seems that way to me as well. > Why standardizing "scripts" (commands read by load or a REPL) at all? > The REPL is not really portable. I guess it's nice if (load "foo.scm") and interpreting from stdin work in a predictable manner. Though you're right that neither of those seem preferred for real work, more for quick experiments.
