Thanks.  Can you fix this, Arvydas?  Just move srfi-194.scm and srfi-194-impl.scm to srfi/194.scm and srfi/194-impl.scm and make internal adjustments.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:50 AM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> wrote:
The library name used by the sample implementation is (srfi-194),
whereas the usual convention described in R7RS suggests (srfi 194).

This is a quibble, but I think confusion might result if the
unconventional name is used:

    (import (srfi 1)
            (srfi 127)
            (srfi 128)
            (srfi 158)
            (srfi-194)
            (srfi 196))

Spot the difference!

Regards,

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"In the presence of the unknown all have an equal right to
think." --Robert G. Ingersoll