On 7/12/20 5:52 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 2:46 PM Arvydas Silanskas
> <xxxxxx@gmail.com
> <mailto:xxxxxx@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     But I agree, it's confusing. Perhaps there should be distinct
>     guidelines on what and how is git'ed. Personally I fork from John's
>     repository, and I make a pull request only when I feel it's stable
>     and has all functionality in accordance to spec.
>
>
> To avoid confusion, you can use me, the editor, as a serializer, and
> stick with the official SRFI repository.  How to organize contributions
> is entirely up to the authors and contributors, except for two things:
>
>  1. The final source of truth will always be the official SRFI
>     repository, e.g. for this one
>     <https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-194>.
>  2. Drafts should come from the editor and be announced so that everyone
>     has a chance to see them with enough time for review.  In
>     particular, some people don't want to use Github, which is fine.  I
>     make all drafts available on the web site, and all versions of the
>     drafts and sample implementations are available there, too.
>

OK.  I hope there will be at least a week or two of quiescence in both
implementation and documentation before finalization so people can test
this SRFI appropriately.

Brad