New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2020 04:40 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators John Cowan (23 Aug 2020 19:40 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2020 20:15 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2020 20:19 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Linas Vepstas (23 Aug 2020 20:27 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2020 20:27 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators John Cowan (23 Aug 2020 20:58 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2020 21:05 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (24 Aug 2020 17:01 UTC)
Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Arthur A. Gleckler (24 Aug 2020 17:06 UTC)

Re: New draft (#4) of SRFI 194: Random data generators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 24 Aug 2020 17:01 UTC

Am So., 23. Aug. 2020 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:
>
> I believe, though the implementation subcommittee {Brad, Linas, Arvydas} is the source of truth for this, that any further changes being discussed will affect only the sample implementation.  Of course, more and more non-uniform distribution procedures can always be added, but I think we can stop here for now.

Should we later agree on further ones of general interest (like those
for random matrices, which are most likely more interesting than the
ellipsoid generator), would they go into a PFN or would we have a new
SRFI replacing this one?

Marc

>> The last call period has ended, but substantial changes have been made.  (John, is more work coming?  I saw a discussion between Bradley and Marc about the Fast Loaded Dice Roller.)

I am back from my short trip and will check the link Bradley sent very soon.