Am Di., 7. März 2023 um 17:42 Uhr schrieb Lucier, Bradley J
<xxxxxx@purdue.edu>:
>
> > On Mar 7, 2023, at 1:52 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This tells me that generators should have their names end with "!”.
>
> I just went through all the procedures in this SRFI.  Maybe the procedure clamp-real-number should have been a procedure for internal use and not exported.
>
> None of the other procedures are generators, per se, they return generators.
>
> I can’t see that, under your criteria, any of the procedure names in this SRFI should end with “!”.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Brad

I'm sorry, Brad, for the misunderstanding.  My remark was not about
changing particular procedures in the SRFI but that it might be a good
idea, in general, to adopt a naming convention of "!" for generators
and accumulators so that imperative pitfalls could be spotted more
easily.