On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:51 AM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> wrote:
What work remains to be done on SRFI 196?  The last substantial changes
were made over three weeks ago, and the ML has been pretty quiet since.

Marc suggested[1] that range-indexer could be allowed to return opaque
objects.  Is there anything else that still needs to be discussed? 

The only unanswered (in a sense) message about SRFI 169 that I have noted is Vladimir Nikishkin's request for a list of references.  John asked him to contribute one, but he didn't reply, so I don't think we have to wait on that, although a list of references would be nice.

I haven't done my final review (that doesn't happen until you call for finalization), but in my notes on the 15th, I wrote that SRFI 196 looked ready.

What do you and John think?