Clarifications for numeric-range Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (29 Aug 2020 17:15 UTC)
Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Arthur A. Gleckler (29 Aug 2020 17:36 UTC)
Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (29 Aug 2020 17:43 UTC)
Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Arthur A. Gleckler (29 Aug 2020 17:49 UTC)
Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (29 Aug 2020 18:31 UTC)
Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (29 Aug 2020 17:41 UTC)
Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (30 Aug 2020 00:05 UTC)

Re: Clarifications for numeric-range Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 29 Aug 2020 17:43 UTC

On 2020-08-29 10:35 -0700, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:15 AM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
> wrote:
>
> > I've pushed a change to the specification of numeric-range which (I
> > think) correctly describes the values contained in the range returned,
> > at least when <step> is non-zero:
> >
>
> Where can I find this change?  It's not in John's repo.

Apologies.  It's at https://github.com/Zipheir/srfi-196 .  I wanted to
defer issuing a PR until after incorporating any feedback.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"I don't really know much about Python.  I only stole its object
system for Perl 5.  I have since repented." --Larry Wall