On 2020-08-31 20:35 +0200, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> As it is not clear to me what is a good use case of range-indexer
> after all, I would consider dropping the procedure.

Agreed.  It should be dropped.  I can't think of any reason to expose
it, especially since some range operations return ranges whose indexers
have unpredictable behavior on their own--i.e. without taking into
account the `start-index' and `length' bounds of a range.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"Invent and fit; have fits and reinvent!" --Alan J. Perlis