Am Mi., 2. Sept. 2020 um 17:56 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
<xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>:
> For completeness, yes, this should be added, since vector-range has
> range->vector, etc. Hopefully this will be it for additional
> conversions and constructors.
I don't think bytevector ranges would be of much use. ;)