Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Sep 2020 11:25 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
John Cowan
(01 Sep 2020 18:19 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Sep 2020 19:45 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(04 Sep 2020 23:15 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
John Cowan
(05 Sep 2020 03:03 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Sep 2020 10:15 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(05 Sep 2020 19:27 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Sep 2020 07:25 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
John Cowan
(05 Sep 2020 23:35 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Sep 2020 07:36 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
John Cowan
(07 Sep 2020 01:09 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Sep 2020 06:18 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
John Cowan
(08 Sep 2020 15:40 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(08 Sep 2020 15:58 UTC)
|
Re: Weaken disjointness of range type?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Sep 2020 09:49 UTC)
|
Am Mo., 7. Sept. 2020 um 03:09 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>: > No. But keeping ranges disjoint from any mutable type such as vectors ensures it. I don't think keeping ranges disjoint from any (potentially) mutable types really ensures it. A statement like "ranges are immutable" wouldn't be affected if the types were disjoint or not disjoint, I think. > I have no intention of changing this. Fair enough.