|
range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(05 Jul 2021 12:48 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Jul 2021 15:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Jul 2021 18:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
John Cowan
(06 Jul 2021 03:40 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(06 Jul 2021 03:49 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
John Cowan
(06 Jul 2021 11:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(06 Jul 2021 16:12 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(06 Jul 2021 18:56 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(06 Jul 2021 19:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(07 Jul 2021 00:40 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(07 Jul 2021 02:10 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(07 Jul 2021 03:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Jul 2021 16:16 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Jul 2021 18:13 UTC)
|
||
On 2021-07-06 12:12 -0400, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > * Following the rest of the traversal procedures, it should run in > O(s) time, where s is the sum of the total accessing time of the > range argument. Oops. This should read "where s is the total accessing time of the range argument". -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> "There's nothing I like less than bad arguments for a view I hold dear." --Daniel Dennett
