range-reverse missing from spec Shiro Kawai (05 Jul 2021 12:48 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Arthur A. Gleckler (05 Jul 2021 15:35 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Arthur A. Gleckler (05 Jul 2021 18:08 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec John Cowan (06 Jul 2021 03:40 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Shiro Kawai (06 Jul 2021 03:49 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec John Cowan (06 Jul 2021 11:08 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Jul 2021 16:12 UTC)
(missing)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Jul 2021 18:56 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Shiro Kawai (06 Jul 2021 19:54 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Jul 2021 00:40 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Shiro Kawai (07 Jul 2021 02:10 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Jul 2021 03:50 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (06 Jul 2021 16:16 UTC)
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Jul 2021 18:13 UTC)

Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 07 Jul 2021 00:40 UTC

On 2021-07-06 09:54 -1000, Shiro Kawai wrote:
> Thanks Wolfgang,
> I updated PR accordingly.  How about this:

Thanks.  However, it includes my mistake ("the sum of the total
accessing time of *range*", which makes no sense), so I'd like to
fix that.

For comparison, range-take-while and -drop-while have

"The runtime of these procedures is asymptotically bounded by the
total accessing time of the range."

Thanks again for patching this.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"In these days the angel of topology and the devil of abstract algebra
fight for the soul of each individual mathematical domain."
--Hermann Weyl