|
range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(05 Jul 2021 12:48 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Jul 2021 15:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Jul 2021 18:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
John Cowan
(06 Jul 2021 03:40 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(06 Jul 2021 03:49 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
John Cowan
(06 Jul 2021 11:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(06 Jul 2021 16:12 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(06 Jul 2021 18:56 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(06 Jul 2021 19:54 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (07 Jul 2021 00:40 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Shiro Kawai
(07 Jul 2021 02:10 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(07 Jul 2021 03:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(06 Jul 2021 16:16 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: range-reverse missing from spec
Arthur A. Gleckler
(06 Jul 2021 18:13 UTC)
|
||
On 2021-07-06 09:54 -1000, Shiro Kawai wrote:
> Thanks Wolfgang,
> I updated PR accordingly. How about this:
Thanks. However, it includes my mistake ("the sum of the total
accessing time of *range*", which makes no sense), so I'd like to
fix that.
For comparison, range-take-while and -drop-while have
"The runtime of these procedures is asymptotically bounded by the
total accessing time of the range."
Thanks again for patching this.
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
"In these days the angel of topology and the devil of abstract algebra
fight for the soul of each individual mathematical domain."
--Hermann Weyl