|
errno groveler in C
Lassi Kortela
(27 Jun 2020 12:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
John Cowan
(27 Jun 2020 12:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
Lassi Kortela
(27 Jun 2020 12:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
hga@xxxxxx
(27 Jun 2020 12:26 UTC)
|
|
SRFI directory layout Lassi Kortela (27 Jun 2020 12:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI directory layout
hga@xxxxxx
(27 Jun 2020 13:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI directory layout
Arthur A. Gleckler
(27 Jun 2020 20:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI directory layout
John Cowan
(27 Jun 2020 13:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI directory layout
Arthur A. Gleckler
(27 Jun 2020 20:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
Arthur A. Gleckler
(27 Jun 2020 16:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
hga@xxxxxx
(27 Jun 2020 12:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
Lassi Kortela
(27 Jun 2020 12:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
Lassi Kortela
(27 Jun 2020 13:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
hga@xxxxxx
(27 Jun 2020 14:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: errno groveler in C
Lassi Kortela
(27 Jun 2020 14:32 UTC)
|
> My suggestions are that all implementation materials be under the srfi > directory, that way the top directory is less cluttered, and my MANIFEST > file at that level can capture them all. Each implementation or tool > should then be under its own subdirectory, like "chibi-scheme" for mine. Arthur should chime in as the SRFI editor and suggest a standardized layout for SRFI repos :) As it stands, the improvised layouts make them hard to navigate unless one is already familiar with a particular repo.
