> From: Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>
> Date: Friday, August 14, 2020 10:43 AM
>
> We're working an 'inner property into the next draft for chaining nested
> errors together.
>
> However, R6RS has a standard way to make compound conditions for that
> purpose. Ideally, on R6RS systems, compound foreign statuses would be
> represented by compound conditions.
>
> <https://api.staging.scheme.org/static/r6rs-lib-errata-corrected.pdf>
> page 26.
>
> [ Not known to exist in other Lisps. ]

I don't see that at all.  I'd rather have SRFI 198 statuses be
regularized for the benefit of end users and code trying to grok them.

A feature only found in one Scheme standard, and Racket's emulation of
it, is something we should use only for inspiration.

- Harold