>> Even so, please push it to Arthur as draft #4. Draft #3 doesn't come
>> close to our ideas any more, and having it posted is highly misleading.
+1
> In progress, e.g. adding all the outstanding issues, am proofreading now.
Thanks a lot for all the patience and effort!
> Following Marc's advice, and adding the above bit about SRFI 34
+1
> (SRFI 12 is withdrawn, so for now I'm assuming systems that still use it don't
> need mentioning in the SRFI)
Normally that policy makes perfect sense. However, SRFI 12 is a bit of a
special case since it's still used by Chicken as John noted.
