>> Even so, please push it to Arthur as draft #4.  Draft #3 doesn't come
>> close to our ideas any more, and having it posted is highly misleading.

+1

> In progress, e.g. adding all the outstanding issues, am proofreading now.

Thanks a lot for all the patience and effort!

> Following Marc's advice, and adding the above bit about SRFI 34

+1

> (SRFI 12 is withdrawn, so for now I'm assuming systems that still use it don't
> need mentioning in the SRFI)

Normally that policy makes perfect sense. However, SRFI 12 is a bit of a
special case since it's still used by Chicken as John noted.