Ok, thanks. Is there anything someone who knows nothing about macros can do?

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:21 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
When I get a chance, the (chibi match) library will be a SRFI, but it's going to take a while.  It's extremely portable (though there are some speed optimizations if you have er-macros).

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:11 PM Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
If the idea is portability, then it would seem like most people would be using this as a replacement of their implementation's pattern matcher, so it doesn't need to be cross-compatible with every implementation's current pattern matcher. I would rather have to learn a syntax that was different from the one I am currently using than just not be able to match on srfi-9 records or r6rs records at all.