Resurrection
Panicz Maciej Godek
(10 Feb 2022 22:09 UTC)
|
Re: Resurrection
Arthur A. Gleckler
(12 Feb 2022 16:35 UTC)
|
Re: Resurrection
Panicz Maciej Godek
(13 Feb 2022 10:35 UTC)
|
Re: Resurrection Amirouche (13 Feb 2022 13:16 UTC)
|
Re: Resurrection
Arthur A. Gleckler
(15 Feb 2022 20:28 UTC)
|
SRFI 200: 630 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Mar 2022 19:04 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 200: 630 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Mar 2022 19:10 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 200: 630 days
Panicz Maciej Godek
(17 Mar 2022 19:29 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 200: 630 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Mar 2022 20:00 UTC)
|
Re: SRFI 200: 630 days
Panicz Maciej Godek
(23 Mar 2022 06:02 UTC)
|
Re: Resurrection Amirouche 13 Feb 2022 13:16 UTC
Hello, I tried to port SRFI-204 to several Scheme implementation, I failed. At this time a reduced test suite pass for the following implementations: - chez - chibi - gambit - gauche - loko - racket - sagittarius And fails for the following implementations: - chicken - cyclone - gerbil - guile - mit You can find the test suite I use at: git clone --branch=match https://github.com/scheme-live/live/ cd live cat live/match/unstable/checks/check-*.scm It seems to me a standard pattern matcher should be possible to implement on top R7RS-small, alas that exclude some rules such as: > ($ record-name pat_1 ... pat_n) a record > > (= field pat) a ``field'' of an object > > (set! identifier) anything, and binds setter > > (get! identifier) anything, and binds getter > The box rule does not seem necessary; a box has no portable `write` representation (so far): > #&qp box I never used a guard. ref: https://github.com/scheme-live/live/pull/67 ref: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-200/ ref: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-204/