Re: New draft (#2) of SRFI 200: Pattern Matching
Amirouche 07 May 2022 07:49 UTC
Both SRFI-204, and SRFI-200 prose looks bizarre. SRFI-204 dwell on examples uses, whereas SRFI-200 has a review of existing pattern matchers, and that makes hard to figure what must be implemented, and neither it is a good material for users of SRFI-200.
re SRFI-200, what is the section of the document describing the recommended pattern matcher?
Best regards