Am Mi., 21. Apr. 2021 um 17:18 Uhr schrieb Adam Nelson <xxxxxx@nels.onl>:

I would consider taking it over. I'm very interested in this topic, and have already written an independent implementation of the WCS pattern-matcher in Schemepunk. Not sure if it makes more sense to continue under the same SRFI number or start a new one.

I'll try writing a clearer specification for it this week, and see how it comes together.

That would be great!!!

PS Loosely related: Somewhere on my TODO list is writing a specification for the pattern matcher SRFI 200 calls the "FHD matcher", which follows a different philosophy than the matcher described in SRFI 204 and would be used in other contexts, and whose principles also underlie the Nanopass framework.