Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher
Felix Thibault
(23 Jul 2020 11:53 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher
Felix Thibault
(23 Jul 2020 12:42 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (23 Jul 2020 13:17 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher
Felix Thibault
(23 Jul 2020 18:07 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher
John Cowan
(23 Jul 2020 18:08 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(23 Jul 2020 19:04 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher
Felix Thibault
(23 Jul 2020 19:29 UTC)
|
Re: New draft (#2) ofSRFI 204: Wright-Cartwright-Shinn PatternMatcher Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen 23 Jul 2020 13:17 UTC
SRFI 204 has to define the identifiers "..1", "?", etc. as auxiliary syntax and the implementing library has to export them. Therefore, a consolidated list of exported identifiers would be very helpful. Furthermore, SRFI 204 should specify that the exported binding of "..." is the same as the exported binding of "..." from the standard library, etc. Marc Am Do., 23. Juli 2020 um 14:42 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com>: > > Sorry, this was re: >> >> I think a consolidated list of exports including all the auxiliary >> >> syntax identifiers is still missing. > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:53 AM Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Are talking about something like this: >> https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-1/srfi-1.html#ProcedureIndex >> >> but including both the patterns and match & co.?