R6RS versus the pattern operators John Cowan (17 Aug 2020 12:55 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2020 13:15 UTC)
(missing)
Fwd: R6RS versus the pattern operators John Cowan (17 Aug 2020 13:38 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2020 13:48 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators John Cowan (17 Aug 2020 14:59 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2020 15:27 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators John Cowan (17 Aug 2020 15:48 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2020 15:53 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators John Cowan (17 Aug 2020 17:03 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Shiro Kawai (17 Aug 2020 17:21 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Shiro Kawai (17 Aug 2020 20:21 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Felix Thibault (17 Aug 2020 22:22 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Shiro Kawai (17 Aug 2020 22:35 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (18 Aug 2020 05:55 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (24 Aug 2020 14:02 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Felix Thibault (27 Aug 2020 00:45 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (27 Aug 2020 07:50 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Lassi Kortela (17 Aug 2020 13:52 UTC)
Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Adam Nelson (17 Aug 2020 14:41 UTC)

Re: R6RS versus the pattern operators Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 17 Aug 2020 15:26 UTC

Am Mo., 17. Aug. 2020 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:

> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:47 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:

>> What about object/@? Isn't "@" as a symbol invalid in R6RS as well?

> No, only when @ appears initially (to avoid confusion between @, foo and @ ,foo.

I have tried to understand R6RS's lexical syntax. According to it,
non-"peculiar" identifiers (that have nothing to do with "@") have to
start with an "initial". The set of initials, however, does not
contain "@". Or is there some erratum?

I'm no R6RS expert, but depending on the final answer to this
question, "@" should be deprecated (and eventually be replaced by
"object") as well.