Proposed additional procedures for 205 from scsh 3.12.6 John Cowan (28 Jul 2020 20:21 UTC)
open-control-tty Lassi Kortela (30 Jul 2020 13:26 UTC)
SRFI 170 & 205 and scsh licensing Lassi Kortela (30 Jul 2020 13:29 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170 & 205 and scsh licensing hga@xxxxxx (30 Jul 2020 13:51 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170 & 205 and scsh licensing Lassi Kortela (30 Jul 2020 14:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170 & 205 and scsh licensing Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Jul 2020 03:49 UTC)
Re: Proposed additional procedures for SRFI 205 from scsh, and licensing from that, including SRFI 170 Lassi Kortela (31 Jul 2020 15:48 UTC)

Re: Proposed additional procedures for SRFI 205 from scsh, and licensing from that, including SRFI 170 Lassi Kortela 31 Jul 2020 15:48 UTC

All of those are good arguments and your diligence is admirable.

However, in this case if we know that Olin wrote those parts of the
manual, we should email him to ask whether he can approve dual-licensing
them as MIT. Going by his past opinions, he ought to be horrified at the
necessity for all these legal deliberations and would be amenable to
doing it. They're practically the same license anyways.