r6rs implementation?
Felix Thibault
(26 Sep 2020 15:28 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Lassi Kortela
(26 Sep 2020 15:41 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Lassi Kortela
(26 Sep 2020 15:44 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Felix Thibault
(26 Sep 2020 16:31 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (26 Sep 2020 17:12 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Lassi Kortela
(26 Sep 2020 18:21 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(26 Sep 2020 17:13 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Lassi Kortela
(26 Sep 2020 18:17 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Oct 2020 13:57 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
John Cowan
(01 Oct 2020 20:15 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Oct 2020 05:19 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
John Cowan
(02 Oct 2020 19:53 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
John Cowan
(02 Oct 2020 20:00 UTC)
|
Sagittarius R6RS-R7RS paper
Lassi Kortela
(05 Oct 2020 06:36 UTC)
|
Re: Sagittarius R6RS-R7RS paper
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Oct 2020 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Oct 2020 20:28 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
John Cowan
(05 Oct 2020 00:06 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Oct 2020 06:29 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
John Cowan
(07 Oct 2020 02:40 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Oct 2020 07:08 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
John Cowan
(11 Oct 2020 03:56 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(11 Oct 2020 13:39 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Felix Thibault
(26 Sep 2020 21:21 UTC)
|
Re: r6rs implementation?
Felix Thibault
(26 Sep 2020 21:47 UTC)
|
Am Sa., 26. Sept. 2020 um 18:31 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com>: > That's what I was wondering about , several of the srfi-206 libraries start off like: > > (define-library (...) > (export ...) > (cond-expand > (else > ...))) > > and I'm not familiar with this idiom- is this just pre-emptive, so that it's easier for people down the line to add implementation-specific code if they need to, or is there some other purpose so that I can't convert to r6rs just by removing the cond-expands? Yes, just pre-emptive or as a placeholder. The else clauses of the SRFI 206 libraries are for the poor-man's-implementation. Implementation-specific code can be put before that line. (If you need a complete implementation of SRFI 206 to test against, I have added it into Unsyntax. (It will always use its internal library.))