r6rs implementation? Felix Thibault (26 Sep 2020 15:28 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Lassi Kortela (26 Sep 2020 15:41 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Lassi Kortela (26 Sep 2020 15:44 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Felix Thibault (26 Sep 2020 16:31 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (26 Sep 2020 17:12 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Lassi Kortela (26 Sep 2020 18:21 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (26 Sep 2020 17:13 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Lassi Kortela (26 Sep 2020 18:17 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (01 Oct 2020 13:57 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? John Cowan (01 Oct 2020 20:15 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Oct 2020 05:19 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? John Cowan (02 Oct 2020 19:53 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? John Cowan (02 Oct 2020 20:00 UTC)
Sagittarius R6RS-R7RS paper Lassi Kortela (05 Oct 2020 06:36 UTC)
Re: Sagittarius R6RS-R7RS paper Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (05 Oct 2020 07:31 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Oct 2020 20:28 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? John Cowan (05 Oct 2020 00:06 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (05 Oct 2020 06:29 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? John Cowan (07 Oct 2020 02:40 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Oct 2020 07:08 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? John Cowan (11 Oct 2020 03:56 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Oct 2020 13:39 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Felix Thibault (26 Sep 2020 21:21 UTC)
Re: r6rs implementation? Felix Thibault (26 Sep 2020 21:47 UTC)

Re: r6rs implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 26 Sep 2020 17:12 UTC

Am Sa., 26. Sept. 2020 um 18:31 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:

> That's what I was wondering about , several of the srfi-206 libraries start off like:
>
> (define-library (...)
>   (export ...)
>   (cond-expand
>     (else
>        ...)))
>
> and I'm not familiar with this idiom- is this just pre-emptive, so that it's easier for people down the line to add implementation-specific code if they need to, or is there some other purpose so that I can't convert to r6rs just by removing the cond-expands?

Yes, just pre-emptive or as a placeholder. The else clauses of the
SRFI 206 libraries are for the poor-man's-implementation.
Implementation-specific code can be put before that line.

(If you need a complete implementation of SRFI 206 to test against, I
have added it into Unsyntax. (It will always use its internal
library.))