Am Mi., 14. Okt. 2020 um 09:04 Uhr schrieb Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
> The reference implementation's define-auxiliary-syntax looks to take only one argument.  It may be just for all-definitions.scm and not the same one as exported from (srfi 206), but kind of confusing.

Yes, it is just implementation-internal. Adding a second argument here
does not make sense because in the poor man's implementation I cannot
define the same auxiliary syntax twice (under different identifiers
but with the same name) and hope that they will be treated as equal.

If you think it causes confusion, I can decorate the identifier to
stress that it has nothing to do with what is exported by (srfi 206).

For Gauche and its users, it makes of course much more sense to forget
about the poor man's implementation and to implement (srfi 206) and
(srfi 206 all) properly so that all tests pass.

Marc