What is/are the shortcomings of the current implementation? Felix Thibault (14 Oct 2020 10:58 UTC)
Re: What is/are the shortcomings of the current implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Oct 2020 11:06 UTC)
Re: What is/are the shortcomings of the current implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Oct 2020 12:09 UTC)
Re: What is/are the shortcomings of the current implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Oct 2020 13:01 UTC)

Re: What is/are the shortcomings of the current implementation? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 14 Oct 2020 12:09 UTC

You mean https://www.unsyntax.org/download/?

Am Mi., 14. Okt. 2020 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
> OK
>
> what's the easiest way to programmatically get the version?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 7:06 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am Mi., 14. Okt. 2020 um 12:59 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
>> <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > I noticed this statement:
>> >
>> > "In principle, there can be a fully conforming R6RS implementation but
>> > that would be implementation-specific like the fully conforming R7RS
>> > implementation in Unsyntax."
>> >
>> > here: https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-206/msg/15343586/
>> >
>> > and I was wondering how the current implementation doesn't conform. Is that the not-implemented error if you (import (srfi 206)) or is it referring to something else?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> And if you do (import (only (srfi 206 all) i-wasnt-predefined)), you
>> will also get an error.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> PS Could you test Unsyntax with your codebase?
>>