Am Mi., 14. Okt. 2020 um 14:53 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:

> No, what meant was if I want to label the test I run by the version of the implementation that's running tests do I look at (features) or is there an (unsyntax-version) or a way to shell out so I can do "unsyntax-scheme -v" [these were all ways I used to label the other tests I ran before].

"--version" or "-v" works. Also, there is "unsyntax-XXX" in the features set.

> We are going somewhere today so it will be a little while before I get back to you on this issue or any others I might have. (I do need to try those tree combos and look at var. Also, have you thought about whether generics would address the equality issue you were talking about earlier?)

Have fun; I don't think we are in a hurry.

As for generics, can you remind me of your plan? So far, I think, the
equality predicate (with equal? being a sensible default) should be
associated with the repeated pattern variables.

Marc

PS In the current draft, the question where the pattern variables are
bound is coupled to the question of whether repeated pattern variables
are supported. As both questions are orthogonal to each other, I would
decouple the options.