Re: r6rs version of poor man's implementation?
Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen 16 Dec 2020 15:49 UTC
I haven't written an R6RS version of the poor man's implementation but
it would be as trivial as the R7RS version.
Am Di., 15. Dez. 2020 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
> Is there an R6RS version of the poor man's implementation that is portable across the various implementations of R6RS, like there is for R7RS?