You forgot the existence of include.

John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> schrieb am So., 11. Okt. 2020, 10:42:


On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:39 AM Daphne Preston-Kendal <xxxxxx@nonceword.org> wrote:

In R7RS they could have different names. (scheme bytestring-notation)
and (scheme bytestring), for instance. (But does cond-expand even make
sense for reader notation? Surely it’d cause a reader error in any
case?)

Exactly so.  Or rather if the lexical syntax was understood, all would be well, but if it was not, you'd get a reader error even if all instances of #u8"..." were protected by cond-expand.



John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
You cannot enter here.  Go back to the abyss prepared for you!  Go back!
Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master.  Go! --Gandalf