On 2020-08-29 16:34 +0200, Göran Weinholt wrote:
> The reference implementation uses nan?, but there's a funny
> complication: nan? in R7RS is also #t for complex numbers if one part is
> NaN. The check should be stricter.

Thanks.  Fixed in the implementation to require both nan? and real?,
per the new SRFI text.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"Some folks think Postmodernism means little more than the Empowerment
of the Vulgar.  Some folks think the same about Perl." --Larry Wall