Remaining issues? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (09 Dec 2020 20:33 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (10 Dec 2020 12:35 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Dec 2020 18:11 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Dec 2020 19:05 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Dec 2020 19:20 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? John Cowan (11 Dec 2020 22:02 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Dec 2020 22:32 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (12 Dec 2020 09:55 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (28 Dec 2020 19:15 UTC)
Re: Remaining issues? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (08 Jan 2021 14:34 UTC)

Re: Remaining issues? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 12 Dec 2020 09:55 UTC

Thank you. I think most of my points have been addressed.

The question about how to make use of SRFI 208 in a safe and portable
fashion, however, remains. Couldn't we add some inspection features?
For example, to use `make-nan` safely, I need to know what the largest
payload may be.

How is the behavior of `make-nan` when the underlying floating-point
implementation allows for payloads but cannot make free use of the
sign or quiet bit? Would this mean that such a Scheme system cannot
provide a `make-nan`?

Am Fr., 11. Dez. 2020 um 23:32 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
<xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>:
>
> On 2020-12-11 17:01 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> > Here's my new text at johnwcowan/srfi-208:
> > [snip]
>
> Thanks.  Looks good to me!
>
> --
> Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
>
> "Earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in a
> cradle forever." --Konstantin Tsiolkovsky