On 2021-02-04 21:48 +0100, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> > SRFI 208 as currently specified maintains what I believe to be the best
> > balance between portability and interoperability achievable.  Therefore, I
> > am firmly opposed to tinkering with it further.
>
> [snip]
>
> I don't think that gcc would set __STDC_IEC_559__ in this case. If it does,
> it would be a compiler bug.

Verily!  So much for all that.  Since John is firmly opposed to
further tinkering, can we finalize this now?  (Barring any outstanding
errors.)

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"In the military more is not better." --_Sun Tzu_