Am Mo., 28. Sept. 2020 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Adam Nelson <xxxxxx@nels.onl>:
>
> +1 for defmacro (more often spelled define-macro in Scheme), because a
> lot of Schemes only have that, and my experience in Schemepunk has been
> that I sometimes have to drop into defmacro to write portable code for a
> few Schemes that have broken syntax-rules/syntax-case implementations.
Consider it added, then.
Please, please no. defmacro doesn't compose with any other macro
system (except to some extent ER). Mixing it is pretty much guaranteed
to break.