New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Sep 2020 15:51 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries John Cowan (28 Sep 2020 16:45 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Sep 2020 17:04 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries John Cowan (28 Sep 2020 17:23 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Sep 2020 17:34 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Sep 2020 17:42 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Sep 2020 17:53 UTC)
Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (28 Sep 2020 17:58 UTC)

Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 211: Scheme Macro Libraries Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 28 Sep 2020 17:42 UTC

Am Mo., 28. Sept. 2020 um 19:34 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:23 AM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote:
>>
>> I meant README.org, though I see that only includes the title and not the abstract.  Is that also built from the SRFI database?
>
>
> Yes, README.org, index.html, and the SRFI home page are all generated from the database.
>
> I probably should add abstracts to the README.org files, but abstracts typically include HTML, so I'd need to convert them to Org format.  Pandoc is great for that, but not perfect, so I haven't done it.  One more item for my infinite to-do list!

:)

It's a bit unfortunate that HTML is the standard for SRFI documents.
If it were an extensible markup language (or even LaTeX in a
restricted form), things would be probably easier both for authors and
for postprocessing.