Random comments John Cowan (08 Oct 2020 21:39 UTC)
Re: Random comments Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Oct 2020 05:25 UTC)
Nomenclature again Lassi Kortela (09 Oct 2020 07:22 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again Lassi Kortela (09 Oct 2020 07:39 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Oct 2020 15:44 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Oct 2020 15:54 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Oct 2020 16:27 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Oct 2020 17:41 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Oct 2020 18:09 UTC)
Re: Nomenclature again John Cowan (09 Oct 2020 21:37 UTC)

Re: Random comments Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 09 Oct 2020 05:25 UTC

Am Do., 8. Okt. 2020 um 23:40 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:

> 2) No Scheme standard uses "array" for anything.  There are several array SRFIs (25, 47, 164, 179, etc.), but they all allow the creation of arrays of any type, including heterogeneous ones.
>
> 3) I don't necessarily support it, but I'll mention "dynavector" as another possible name.

"dynarray" would be better IMO, albeit I think that "vectorlist" is
still better.