Re: New draft (#2) of SRFI 214: Flexvectors
siiky 08 Feb 2021 22:35 UTC
On 2/8/21 01:10, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> While the specification of the SRFI, as defined in the document, can't
> change after it is finalized, the sample implementation can be fixed or
> improved at any point. We welcome your contributions whenever they arrive.
>
> Thanks.
Oh, perfect! The more I know! :)
Regards,
André Sá
