|
Several comments
shivers@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 02:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Per Bothner
(10 Mar 2001 03:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
sperber@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 08:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
shivers@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 17:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Martin Gasbichler
(11 Mar 2001 14:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 16:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
sperber@xxxxxx
(20 Mar 2001 16:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 17:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
sperber@xxxxxx
(22 Mar 2001 08:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Marc Feeley
(22 Mar 2001 13:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx (22 Mar 2001 13:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Marc Feeley
(22 Mar 2001 15:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
sperber@xxxxxx
(22 Mar 2001 15:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Marc Feeley
(22 Mar 2001 15:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Per Bothner
(22 Mar 2001 17:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Several comments
Marc Feeley
(22 Mar 2001 18:22 UTC)
|
Re: Several comments sperber@xxxxxx 22 Mar 2001 13:29 UTC
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes: Marc> A third alternative, which is my least favorite is to pin down the Marc> name of the entry point, for example "script-main". A script would Marc> look like this Marc> #! /bin/sh Marc> "exec" "scheme-script" "$0" "$@" Marc> (define (script-main arg1 arg2) Marc> (write (+ (string->number arg1) (string->number arg2)))) Marc> and "scheme-script" would always invoke "script-main" after loading a Marc> script. I can imagine going with that. Opinions, anyone else? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla