> I think we are far from reaching general consensus and that there is
> more to do than just to decide between the three points you posted.

That speaks in favor of withdrawing the SRFI. It's quite an
idiosyncratic addition to the existing Scheme syntax, and only 4 of us
took part in the design discussion (none of whom are authors of the
widely used Scheme implementations), so we don't have enough authority.
Let's withdraw it then.

I agree that taking longer to digest the ideas would be useful,
preferably with people from the established Scheme implementations on board.