Erratum: typo in compound-access Zhu Zihao (17 Mar 2026 03:59 UTC)
Re: Erratum: typo in compound-access Arthur A. Gleckler (17 Mar 2026 04:03 UTC)
Re: Erratum: typo in compound-access John Cowan (17 Mar 2026 05:18 UTC)
Re: Erratum: typo in compound-access Zhu Zihao (17 Mar 2026 14:01 UTC)
Re: Erratum: typo in compound-access Arthur A. Gleckler (17 Mar 2026 15:16 UTC)

Re: Erratum: typo in compound-access Zhu Zihao 17 Mar 2026 07:26 UTC
I made a PR here: https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-222/pull/5

John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> writes:

> Correct.  Please fix.
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 12:03 AM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
>  That sounds right.  John, would you please review this correction?
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 9:01 PM Zhu Zihao <xxxxxx@163.com> wrote:
>
>  In the section of 'compound-access': "If obj satisfies predicate,
>  accessor is applied to obj and the result is returned. Otherwise, if obj
>  is a compound object, accessor is applied to the first subobject that
>  satisfies obj, and the result is returned. Otherwise, default is
>  returned."
>
>  If I understand correctly, "accessor is applied to the first subobject
>  that satisfies obj" should be "accessor is applied to the first
>  subobject that satisfies predicate" (obj -> predicate).  "satisfies obj"
>  seems to be nonsense.

--
Retrieve my PGP public key:
执行下列命令以获取我的 PGP 公有密钥:

  gpg --recv-keys B3EBC086AB0EBC0F45E0B4D433DB374BCEE4D9DC

Zihao / 閱卜錄