On 2021-09-06 19:37 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> I think we can do without (ignore) altogether, since there is no
> requirement for tail-calling.

Yes, 'ignore' is vestigial; thanks for pointing this out.  Perhaps
removing it could be errata-ed into SRFI 224.

> I think there is an error in 224: (update v') should say "except for (k,
> v)", just like (delete)

Can you mentioun where in 224 you found this?  I couldn't find
"(update v')" anywhere in the SRFI document.

> What do you say to `dict-find-change`? A bit verbose, but nicely
> descriptive.

Definitely better.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." --Wolfgang Pauli